 |
| New Strategy U.S. Anti-Terrorist Islamic mention as Radical Terrorist |
Last month, Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, who admitted that their concept called "war on terror" as an action in a hurry to counter the events of 11 September.
The concept is also acknowledged a mistake and just cause "more harm than good." In an article in the Guardian just after Obama took office as president, Miliband threw relentless criticism of the strategy that was premature, because it confirmed that the West can easily "kill" all in their way.
This month, security and counter-terrorism minister, Lord West, also admitted a similar effect to the policy Ingggris against radicalism. But West just blame Blair previous policy failed to analyze the error and correct it.
He referred to the case which resulted in the massacre of Palestinians by Israel in Gaza. "There is no doubt when you look at this picture reappears, that are always present in the head of every man is relentless hatred, there hbubungan between the U.S., Israel, and the UK," he said, followed by London and Washington's rejection of the destruction in Gaza.
While at the end of "consciousness" can only be welcomed, they were only able to rectify the policy makes the policy that only Islam, Mosque, Imam, and the School of Religion as the main target Muslims. Though it is a very complicated political issues and as set out in the Geneva Convention, a lot of U.S. and British policy in tackling terrorism is a violation of human rights very seriously. The policy emphasizes only method of punishment without charge. Pera practitioners and legal experts expressed their shock at the damage for almost seven years goes counter terrorist methods in different parts of the world .. They also recommended a reconsideration of the policy of the oppressive policies of human rights.
Following in the footsteps of the Geneva Conventions, the former head of the security agency MI5, Dame Stella Rimington, accused the British government to exploit the fear of terrorism to restrict civil liberties. "The government should better recognize the risks that can occur daripda simply scare mongering society to execute laws which bind individual liberty, especially laws on terrorism-which make us live in fear," according to the Rimington. He also previously has criticized the policy that gives the policy of detention without trial for terrorism suspects for 42 days, and a controversial plan to show ID.
Premature action against terorsime law shows that it is actually the law that already applies quite qualified to handle the problems that arise. The worse thing is shown by the method of interrogation conducted by the U.S., which we hope will soon come to an end with the closure of Guantanamo by Obama and a reconsideration of military law against terrorism suspects.
The Muslim News has dedicated a page that contains a warning about government policies that crippled the terrorism laws that have an adverse effect on the creation of a harmonious society. Sepetinya But the government has not learned much because the next time they are not trying to improve the methods of fighting terrorism, but rather they are an attempt to widen the definition of Muslim Radicals.
It is not fair to label all those who promote Shariah law, and believes in jihad and argued that homosexuality is a sin, as being extremely sensible. If the draft strategy was approved by the government, fear that in the end all Muslims will be considered as extremists (a thing which even now is already happening) and will feel alienated.
The government should not just swallow raw crude opinions of anyone who is acting as advisor. Terorrisme cons of the new method is also still require deeper thinking if we want to override the marginalization and ultimately make more people turn out to be radical.
Source: Reuters
Are you sick and tired from searching for bitcoin faucets?
ReplyDeleteDouble your claimed satoshis with this amazing BTC FAUCET ROTATOR.